Unfortunately, the Biden administration has clearly set its goal to permanently codify decarbonization into the United States’ regulatory fabric.
Decarbonization is generally considered a reasonable goal when presented within the context of a trend, as opposed to an absolute. However, the controversy lies with how the regulatory environment prescribes decarbonization in the form of net zero or bust.
The existing regulatory landscape fails to recognize that the U.S. represents only 14% of total global emissions, so it is not practical to prioritize net zero above our country’s long-term economic well-being. In other words, a new set of costly consequences arise if the U.S. sacrifices economic efficiency solely for net zero.
This dynamic becomes increasingly complicated when we deliberate what the global economy will look like over the next two decades. At this point, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is already overdiscussed, but it is critical to reinforce just how expansive AI technology will become.
By 2030, the AI industry is anticipated to experience a 20-fold increase, which equates to roughly a $2 trillion industry. Forbes expects AI will contribute a 21% increase to U.S. GDP by 2030. The regulatory market fails to acknowledge the exponential growth in power and energy the AI ecosystem will demand.
Ironically, the push for electric vehicles (EV) is partly responsible for the rise in AI. Forbes reported that 10% of vehicles will be driverless by 2030, a capability facilitated almost entirely by AI.
Overall, 64% of businesses believe that AI will help increase productivity. What is commonly left out of consideration is how energy, power and AI are directly connected. As of March, U.S. officials have earmarked nearly $30 billion in subsidies for advanced semiconductor manufacturing, aiming to bring cutting-edge AI chip development and manufacturing to American soil.
A single data center can consume the equivalent electricity of 50,000 homes. The U.S. will need more than one additional data center to facilitate that anticipated boom in AI. According to research firm Data Bridge Market Research, spending in the global AI infrastructure market—including data centers, networks and other hardware that support the use of AI applications—is expected to reach $422.55 billion by 2029, growing at a compound annual rate of 44% over the next six years.
The U.S. government actively subsidizes AI technologies, which directly conflicts with our administration’s efforts to achieve net zero. Herein lies a very confusing, yet fascinating dynamic. It is clear these goals will not go away, so the market must identify a solution that allows policymakers to have their cake and eat it, too. Luckily, this solution already exists, although it is currently nascent.
Research suggests it would be foolish for the U.S. not to foster the economic prowess that derives from AI. That is not a controversial statement. Controversy continually enters the fold once the regulatory market overlaps a push to attain net zero.
Given the exponential increase in power demand, we also must remain intellectually honest about net zero-aggregated operational net zero, which is largely in direct conflict with a growing economy. While many companies are making headway, most global industries will never be adequately positioned to achieve true net zero.
This dynamic represents the foundational premise for the rise of carbon credits. Reducing economic prowess does not serve shareholders or society at large. Simultaneously, the call to attain net zero, at least in some form, will likely not wane in the foreseeable future.
This forms the perfect recipe for the carbon credit markets. Several thought leaders anticipate a rapid maturation in this space. A high-quality, verified credit provides a management team wishing to expand economic output with a financial instrument that mitigates its carbon footprint.
Since the AI revolution will require vast incremental energy, the energy sector must increasingly understand how to participate in the carbon markets efficiently.
This focus also accomplishes two distinct adjacent capabilities. Companies can be more realistic and practical with their environmental goals, i.e., utilizing carbon credits to “fill the gap,” thereby reducing greenwashing accusations. The impending carbon markets will also facilitate an expedited research and development curve in AI, i.e., less apprehension to pursue specific R&D and growth strategies associated with higher carbon emissions.
Though the carbon markets are in their early stages and remain far from perfect, they offer the proverbial “silver bullet” that mitigates the need to sacrifice economic output because of potential emissions implications.
Dan Romito is consulting partner for Pickering Energy Partners.
Recommended Reading
The Jones Act: An Old Law on a Voyage to Nowhere
2024-04-12 - Keeping up with the Jones Act is a burden for the energy industry, but efforts to repeal the 104-year-old law may be dead in the water.
Kinder Morgan Exec: Building Pipelines ‘Challenging, but Manageable’
2024-04-05 - Allen Fore, vice president of public affairs for Kinder Morgan, said building anything, from a new road to an ice cream shop, can be tough but dealing with stakeholders up front can move projects along.
FERC Again Approves TC Energy Pipeline Expansion in Northwest US
2024-04-19 - The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shot down opposition by environmental groups and states to stay TC Energy’s $75 million project.
BWX Technologies Awarded $45B Contract to Manage Radioactive Cleanup
2024-03-05 - The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management awarded nuclear technologies company BWX Technologies Inc. a contract worth up to $45 billion for environmental management at the Hanford Site.
Belcher: Our Leaders Should Embrace, Not Vilify, Certified Natural Gas
2024-03-18 - Recognition gained through gas certification verified by third-party auditors has led natural gas producers and midstream companies to voluntarily comply and often exceed compliance with regulatory requirements, including the EPA methane rule.