<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can drilling trigger a mud volcano?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.epmag.com/tayvis/2008/11/10/can-drilling-trigger-a-mud-volcano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.epmag.com/tayvis/2008/11/10/can-drilling-trigger-a-mud-volcano/</link>
	<description>Tayvis Dunnahoe, Senior Editor</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J E Cabello</title>
		<link>http://blogs.epmag.com/tayvis/2008/11/10/can-drilling-trigger-a-mud-volcano/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>J E Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.epmag.com/tayvis/?p=13#comment-53</guid>
		<description>The text below is from a presentation that reached my inbox in October 2006:

Objective was gas prospect in the Kujung limestone, known to be over-pressured in East Java area.
 Word on the street is that Lapindo had significant open hole (about 3,000 ft ?) below casing shoe when they took a kick on 29 May while drilling (into the Kujung?) at 9,297 feet.
 Massive well kick, flowed hot water to surface completely unloading the well.
 When well shut-in, underground blow out occurred, possibly breaking down casing shoe.  Water surfaced about 200 meters from the rig (the “mud volcano”).
 Flow rate reported to be greater than 300,000 Bbls / day
 SOP (and BPMIGAS-approved drilling program?) calls for intermediate protective casing at about 8,500 ft.  Casing never run.
 Relief well operations not yet successful.
_____________________

I don't know what is fact and what isn't. But I do look as warily upon "official data" as I do on "word on the street". 
I Haven't looked  at the full paper published recently, but from this article, and the previous information I have seen (including bullet points above), I still think it likely that the root cause for the mud flow was an underground blowout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text below is from a presentation that reached my inbox in October 2006:</p>
<p>Objective was gas prospect in the Kujung limestone, known to be over-pressured in East Java area.<br />
 Word on the street is that Lapindo had significant open hole (about 3,000 ft ?) below casing shoe when they took a kick on 29 May while drilling (into the Kujung?) at 9,297 feet.<br />
 Massive well kick, flowed hot water to surface completely unloading the well.<br />
 When well shut-in, underground blow out occurred, possibly breaking down casing shoe.  Water surfaced about 200 meters from the rig (the “mud volcano”).<br />
 Flow rate reported to be greater than 300,000 Bbls / day<br />
 SOP (and BPMIGAS-approved drilling program?) calls for intermediate protective casing at about 8,500 ft.  Casing never run.<br />
 Relief well operations not yet successful.<br />
_____________________</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what is fact and what isn&#8217;t. But I do look as warily upon &#8220;official data&#8221; as I do on &#8220;word on the street&#8221;.<br />
I Haven&#8217;t looked  at the full paper published recently, but from this article, and the previous information I have seen (including bullet points above), I still think it likely that the root cause for the mud flow was an underground blowout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
